An OBVIOUS Example of Corruption in the U.S. Judicial System

Date:   June 10, 2011

To:       Carol G. Green, Secretary – Via Email:  judicialqual@kscourts.org

Commission on Judicial Qualifications (“The Commission”)

301 SW Tenth, Room 374

Topeka, Kansas  66612

785-296-2913

Ms. Green –

Your response is insulting on many levels, and suggests an abandonment of integrity within the U.S. judicial system by the state of Kansas, and perhaps criminal collusion on your part.  Without any question or reservation, Judge Svaty MUST be removed from the "bench" and disbarred.

Reasons to Extricate and Disbar Judge Svaty

1. “The Commission” is a self-policing entity whose mandate is to ensure four simple Canons be followed by its judges, in that they should:
1. Avoid impropriety and the appearance of impropriety
2. Competently perform their duties
3. Avoid conflicts of interest; and
4. Remain independent

If you bothered to read my submission, you’d realize Judge Svaty violated ALL FOUR Canons.  In fact, his actions are so egregious, they warrant his disbarment, for he represents an outright menace to society, as outlined in the points that follow.

2. Judge Svaty knowingly colluded with attorney Jane Isern in:
1. Jurisdiction fraud – the matter has NOTHING to do with Kansas; 
2. Denial of due process – he held a bogus hearing which he knew one of the parties could not possibly attend, nor have legal representation for
3. Judge Svaty incompetently awarded full custody and all parental rights (based on a petition seeking joint custody) to a first-time mother, high school drop-out and soon-to-be convicted felon with well-known and extensively documented psychological issues (hereinafter “Reckless Mother”), and did so to the exclusion of an accomplished master-degreed Ivy-league educated father of three highly successful adult sons
4. Judge Svaty rendered a baseless draconian decision citing a fraudulent, unspecified and entirely concocted rationale (e.g., a phone conversation with his secretary to merely confirm his email address)
5. Judge Svaty recklessly awarded and derived baseless child support as he DELIBERATELY ignored it has all been substantially pre-paid to the Reckless Mother while incompetently disregarding a overriding salient uncertainty, which is covered in the next point;
6. Judge Svaty made an entirely incompetent determination of paternity, and did so despite being provided overwhelming evidence of the Reckless Mother’s promiscuous behavior during the period of conception.  Accordingly, the identity of the true father remains very much in doubt, and Judge Svaty did so knowing the Reckless Mother refused to provide requisite DNA samples;
7. Judge Svaty condoned, or otherwise disregarded to the prior fraudulent acts and ethics complaint filed against the Reckless Mother’s attorney (Jane Isern).

Demand for Investigation

Based on the aforesaid, the Commission has FULL and COMPLETE jurisdiction and I DEMAND FULL INVESTIGATION into Judge Svaty’s ATROCITIES!!!  And don’t insult me by suggesting I appeal this outright ABOMINATION . . . for you very well know the deadline to appeal this 100% FRAUDULENT DECISION  expired TWO DAYS AGO. 

In order to provide proper context for the wide public, law enforcement and media distribution of this instance of blatant judicial corruption is receiving, I have:

Ø      Reproduced our email correspondence (see below);

Ø      Provided public access for complaint filed against Judge Svaty – click here

Ø      Provided public access for complaint filed against Jane Isern – click here

Ø      Posted this communique on-line, which can be accessed by clicking here.

Planned Assassination (Certainly of Character and Possibly of Person)

The aforesaid corrupt actions are ALL linked to the MorganStanleyGate scandal, and are intended to undermine the credibility of the now massive claims by attempting to depict me as “deadbeat father”, and eventually silence me.  Judge Svaty was directed to aggressively issue an entirely bogus arrest order in the near future, and wayward deputies would say I “resisted arrest”, shoot me dead in their own “self-defense”, and then plant a gun on me.  Click here for some other attempts made on my life.

Judge Svaty’s fraudulent arrest order would be deemed “contempt” and predicated on violating some baseless provision in a bogus ex parte TRO I learned about in a Barton County Court ROA but was never provided a copy.  Alternatively, the arrest order could be based upon non-payment of Judge Svaty’s meritless child support, which is explained further below.

Meritless Child Support

Be advised, this entire sequence of events has been a BLATANTLY ORCHESTRATED FRAUD, for which Judge Svaty has played a prominent role, and serves as preamble to the above-described planned assassination.  Importantly, on May 9, 2011, Judge Svaty directed monthly payments of $373 to commence and be made to the “Kansas Payment Center” starting (eight days earlier) on May 1 – ergo, as of the date of this letter, I would be considered “delinquent”. 

Such directed payments are null and void because:

Ø      The Paternity Obligation has not been Established as the Reckless Mother has refused to submit buccal samples for DNA testing;

Ø      Reckless Mother has been prepaid $34,000 -- In the event paternity is in fact established, this represents the prepayment of conditional child support for the next 7 ½  years

Ø      Reckless Mother has been prepaid another $20,000 – This represents a $20,000 loan to pay down her high interest credit card debt which has has not repaid.  Excluding statutory interest, this would mean to she has been prepaid conditional child support for an additional  4 ½ years

Ø      Reckless Mother has Engaged in Grand Larceny Theft of at least another $75,000 – this covers three separate events where she has stolen such things as a Mercedes Benz S-320, valuable paintings, high end electronic equipment, household appliances, furniture, etc.  In the event criminal charges are dropped, and the fair market value of the items stolen by the Reckless Mother are conditionally deemed prepaid conditional child support, this would take such an obligation (should it in fact exist) well past the age for which child support would apply

Ø      Income Implicit in Child Support calculation is a FRAUD – The income used to calculate child support does NOT currently exist, as I have been unlawfully denied a livelihood in the MorganStanleyGate scandal.  One cannot pay what one does not have, and there is no such thing as a “debtor’s prison” in America – but that is what Judge Svaty’s planned actions would suggest.

Accordingly, even if the paternity tests were to indicate I am the natural father of the minor child (now 3 years old), there are NO conditions where I would have any child support obligation whatsoever.

Judge Svaty is reprehensible and dangerous – he MUST be REMOVED AS A JUDGE and DISBARRED, and I will do whatever is necessary to ensure this manifestation . . . for the public MUST be protected from this MONSTER.

Respectfully submitted,

Spencer C. Young

Prior Emails Exchanged with The Commission

-----Original Message-----
From: judicialqual <judicialqual@kscourts.org>
To: 'spencercyoung@aol.com' <spencercyoung@aol.com>
Sent: Thu, Jun 9, 2011 6:50 am
Subject: Your e-mail sent June 3, 2011

Dear Mr. Young,

This Commission does not have jurisdiction over legal and appealable matters.  Appeals can be taken from a decision of the district court to the Court of Appeals.  You have not otherwise provided any information which suggests a violation of the judicial code.

I am sorry we are unable to assist you in that regard.

Cordially,

Carol G. Green, Secretary

Commission on Judicial Qualifications

301 SW Tenth, Room 374

Topeka, Kansas  66612

785-296-2913

------Original Message------

To: judicialqual

Subject: Re: Your complaint against District Judge Ron Svaty

Sent: Jun 3, 2011 4:12 PM

Are you saying you are not going to investigate this OBVIOUS instance of 

unethical conduct? 

-----Original Message-----
From: judicialqual <judicialqual@kscourts.org>
To: 'spencercyoung@aol.com' <spencercyoung@aol.com>
Sent: Fri, Jun 3, 2011 8:54 am
Subject: Your complaint against District Judge Ron Svaty

Dear Mr. Young:

The Commission on Judicial Qualifications considers and investigates complaints of alleged unethical conduct of state court judges under the Code of Judicial Conduct.  The powers of the Commission are not the same as those of an appellate court. The Commission does not consider legal issues or matters which involve the judicial discretion of a judge in deciding a case. Those decisions must be appealed to a higher court if errors are thought to have occurred. This Commission has no jurisdiction regarding district court jurisdiction, child custody, or child support.

I am sorry we are unable to assist you.

Cordially,

Carol G. Green, Secretary

Commission on Judicial Qualifications

301 SW Tenth, Room 374

Topeka, Kansas  66612

785-296-2913