An Attorney's Unethical Behavior & Fiancee's Reprehensible Acts

This entire situation is quite remarkable, and "the gloves are coming off", as reflected below.  If you enjoy seeing a corrupt and unethical attorney get crucified then by all means read on, but be advised a woefully unfaithful fiancee' is also aptly taken to the shed.  Yes, this is a further manifestation of the effects of MorganStanleyGate, and why those responsible MUST be brought to justice.

Date:  March 30, 2011

To:       Jane Isern (via email) of Brown, Isern & Carpenter

Cc:      Leah Krier (via email)

Judy Burnette of the District Court of Barton County, KS (email)

Mary Gatton of the District Court of Barton County, KS (via email)

Roughly 500 Others Who Know, Or Know of Leah (via email)

Judge Ron Svaty (via email)

Subject:  Your Continued Fraudulent & Unethical Behavior

Ridiculing you is like shooting fish in a barrel – for each time I expose what an utterly classless imbecile you are, you give me increasingly absurd folly with which to crucify you further.  And because my disdain for you has reached new heights, I will utilize expletives throughout this document for two reasons: (1) to aptly convey my deep-rooted hatred for the fraud you are and what you represent; and (2) to replicate and therefore make a mockery of the typical classless utterances of your trailer-park-trash-client, Leah Krier.  

In my opinion, you’re a miserable excuse for a human being and the most cognitively challenged and unethical attorney I have yet come across.  I’m sure Larry the Cable Guy had amoral incompetent buffoons such as you in mind when referring to “99% of all attorneys who give the rest a bad name”.  However, when insulting someone so very worthy of ridicule, sometimes less is more – ergo, please click here for a concise summary of my feelings toward you.

Your March 24 Letter & Journal Entry

I explained how sending me correspondence via regular mail may never reach me and asked you to communicate by email only – so what do you do?   You send me a letter and Journal Entry by regular mail dated March 24, which I, only by chance, received today (March 30), and you then ask for a response 10 days from the date of your letter – to that I say “fuck you”.  Be advised, I will only accept correspondence from you via email from this point forward.   Any correspondence from you by “snail-mail” will be discarded unopened and deemed not sent.  

And with regard to the contents of your letter, what don’t you understand?  Your FRAUD was exposed and you now face charges of serious ethics violations from the Kansas Judicial Branch, and ultimate disbarment.  And to underscore what a bold fucking liar you are, let me point out a few things in your latest correspondence:

1.     You had no choice but to acknowledge your motion for default judgment was a fraud as my response was obviously made on time, and you very knew this to be the case.

2.     You failed to address your surreptitious and fraudulent efforts to obtain a default judgment without my knowledge, and you might have gotten away with it, if I hadn’t directly contacted the Barton County District Court, based on a gut instinct that you were a Goddamn lying fucking bitch, and boy did you ever corroborate that assessment.

3.     You said “the problem” was that I failed to send my “Answer” to you – fuck you – that is complete bullshit, and you know it, you fucking liar.  You run such a backward 19^TH century law firm, you don’t have a website address, and you never publicly published an email address or fax number until i forced you to do so.  Accordingly, I sent my “Answer” to Leah, and directed her to forward it to you in the event she didn’t withdraw the meritless Petition.  And she did in fact forward it to you, per your instructions, you Goddamn lying fucking bitch – therefore, you received my “Answer” two days before the statutory due date, which was further evidenced by roughly 500 concurrently emailed witnesses (also copied herein) who know, or otherwise know of Leah.

4.     In addition, Judy Burnett of the Barton County District Court confirmed she had printed and delivered my Answer to you, indicating it was timely received, thereby supporting my opinion of you as pond scum.

5.     Your own voicemail message beautifully evidences what an utterly deceitful fucking bitch you really are.  I tried calling you on numerous occasions during the week of March 14th, but you ducked my calls – so I demanded a return call indicating times I would be available.  So what do you do?  You call 3 times within minutes of each other, during the time period I expressly said I would not be available, and you leave a bizarre and entirely unjustified constraint to communication, which you deliberately orchestrated so that I could not reach you until after your fraudulent default judgment was awarded – Click here to dowload this file and play on Microsoft’s Media Player.

The Salient Aspects of the Bogus Paternity Petition

As pointed out in my letter to Leah on March 2, and in my letter to you on March 9 , as well as in my March 18 Motion to Dismiss:

Ø The state of Kansas has no jurisdiction over this matter whatsoever, and you know it, which is why I view you as a Goddamn fucking legal whore;

Ø Leah has no financial claims whatsoever (in fact, she owes me $78,000 +), as she has received a $34,000 prepayment, which according to her expressed written needs for Jackson, will cover him for the next five years – and the fact that you informed Leah she was the rightful owner of MY engagement ring indicates either a reckless disregard for the truth or gross incompetence – I suggest it is both, for in my opinion, you are an  incompetent legal skank;

And wasting your time and efforts on a matter you know has no jurisdictional relevance in Kansas (or in any state for that matter because any paternity-related claims, if they in fact exist have been prepaid for the next five years), is merely racking up legal fees for you, which Leah will have to pay, rather than have those funds available for the care of Jackson.  Once again, in my opinion, I consider you an ignorant attorney slut.

Leah’s Continued Reckless Behavior

Further supporting your irrelevance, Leah also engaged a family law attorney in North Carolina (obviously with similarly lacking ethics as you), and has attempted to smear me with fabricated allegations of recent domestic violence and abuse, which would be quite impossible since I have not seen, nor been in the same state as her or Jackson for over a year.  I am also not a coward who hits women and children, which is a common trait among her other past boyfriends.

By comparison, I have raised three very accomplished young adult men.  For instance, my oldest son Michael graduated with honors from Duke University, and his brother Kevin is currently a senior at Duke, while twin brother Ryan is an All-American at Maryland.  Leah’s malicious effort to smear me was merely a feckless attempt to cover-up her own criminal grand larceny, whorish behavior and reckless, haphazard and dangerous arrangements made in the care of Jackson.  I have exposed her numerous transgressions, along with instances of corruption in the Durham Police Dept., and rumor has it that Leah ended up fucking the investigating officers to get them to go along with her ridiculous charade.  And I’ve also been hearing she’s contracted various venereal diseases (specifically herpes and syphilis).

In fact, I’ve received evidence about her fucking so many different guys, it appears she’s turned into a full-fledged prostitute.  I am so sad that Jackson has such a woeful disgrace for a mother, who is so poorly educated (with barely a high school diploma) and so utterly desperate at this point, it seems the only thing she knows how to do is get drunk, spread her legs, and then shack up with some guy she barely knows for the time being. (NOTE to Leah:  Congratulations are in order for this now infamous distinction on your 37^th Birthday today as a bonafide criminal fucking whore.)

Paternity DNA Testing

Jane, since Kansas has no jurisdiction over this matter, it is inappropriate for you to be involved in any associated aspect of paternity DNA testing.  Moreover, you have demonstrated yourself to be thoroughly devoid of moral principles, and appear incapable of administering anything in a fair and equitable manner, because in my opinion, you have no fucking integrity whatsoever. 

However, let me point out further evidence of your heartlessness and ignorance.  It is entirely unnecessary and frankly inhumane to subject little Jackson to the pain of extracting blood, you stupid fucking psychopath – a buccal swab of the inner cheek is all that’s needed – the same goes for Leah (yes, it is needed for the mother, you Goddamn moron), and the cost is dramatically less.

Your Suggested Stipulation

Your suggestion that I enter into “an agreed upon stipulation finding that [I am] not the father . . . and [that I would then] be dismissed from this case” is patently insulting – for even if it turns out I am not Jackson’s natural father, I feel an overwhelming obligation to rescue that little boy from the clutches of someone who, in my opinion is an astonishingly ignorant and uneducated criminal, and a venereal-diseased whore who lacks moral values altogether – she is an unfit mother in every way, shape and form.

Another Diabolical Trap Exposed

I’ve learned the real reason why you’ve been trying to lure me to Barton County on this concocted legal matter that has absolutely no jurisdictional relevance in the state of Kansas.  Upon receiving a copy of the ROA (“Register of Action”) Report on this bogus matter from Mary Gatton of the Barton County District Court, I noted references to “temporary orders” in October 2010. 

When I asked Ms. Gatton what these were, along with a request to send me a copy of them, she oddly refused to do so.  I’m surmising these “ex parte orders” were wrongfully granted based on utter bullshit lies presented without my knowledge, and likely contain vague language warning against “harassment”.

This would set the stage to arrest and incarcerate me for God knows how long, upon my merely showing up in court, for “contempt of such orders” based on a thoroughly concocted determination of harassment – for example, emails and/or website entries that I have every right to issue/publish, pursuant to my first amendment right to free speech . . . especially since they are all predicated on statements of verifiable facts.

Your Relationship to John Isern

When I asked Ms. Gatton if you were related to John Isern, the Court Administrator for the 20^th district (which includes Barton County), she reluctantly said “yes”, but oddly refused to divulge the nature of your relationship to this person – so I’ll pose it directly to you: “What is your relationship to John Isern?” and understand this is relevant to the ethics complaints and disbarment claims filed against you.

My Demand

I no longer request, but DEMAND you withdraw the Bogus Paternity Petition and stop wasting your client’s limited funds, which should instead be used for Jackson’s needs, not your esurient interests. 

I expect a response from you by April 4, which coincides with the ridiculous deadline you gave me.

Sincerely,

Spencer C. Young

Motion to Dismiss Thwarts Fraudulent Default Judgment

This action was filed pro se on March 18th by Spencer C. Young, and successfully thwarted a fraudulent attempt to obtain a default judgment on a bogus Paternity Petition filed by an exceptionally crooked and unethical attorney, Jane Isern of Brown, Isern & Carpenter on behalf of Mr. Young's Fiancee, Leah R. Krier.   It is bogus because: (1) Kansas has no jurisdictional authority on the matter; (2) any paternity claims (if they in fact exist) have been pre-paid for the next five years, so that Mr. Young can focus on regaining all that was stolen from the multifaceted MorganStanleyGate scandal.

Sadly, this is yet another instance of the terrible aftermath of MorganStanleyGate, where what may be the worst instance of bank foreclosure fraud in U.S. history was carried out by Paragon Commercial Bank at the behest of Morgan Stanley on a mortgage that was NEVER late, NOT Delinquent and PAID-IN-FULL

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF BARTON COUNTY, KANSAS

MOTION FOR DISMISSAL

Case No. 2010 - DM - 399

JACKSON S. YOUNG by and through his next of friend

 and natural mother, LEAH R. KRIER

and

SPENCER C. YOUNG

Now comes the Respondent (Spencer C. Young), acting in a pro se capacity, who requests the District Court of Barton County, Kansas (hereinafter, the “Court”) to dismiss Petitioner’s (Leah R. Krier’s) Motion for Default Judgment for Custody and Support (Exhibit A), which was filed on her behalf by her attorney, Jane Isern of Brown, Isern & Carpenter.

In Support

Motion for dismissal is hereby made because of the following relevant facts:

(1)  Lack of Jurisdictional Authority – With all due respect intended, this Court has no jurisdiction over the parties, nor the issues of this case, as the Petitioner has a long established and currently maintained residency in the state of North Carolina (along with her son, Jackson,  who was born in Durham, NC), while the Respondent has never had any resident association with the State of Kansas;

(2)  Answer Was Timely Filed by Respondent – Notwithstanding the glaring issue of  jurisdictional authority, Respondent nevertheless timely filed an Answer (hereinafter the “Answer”) with this Court as a precautionary measure of prudence and in deference to this Court;

(3)  Respondent’s Preceding Acts of Good Faith – A copy of the Answer was provided to Petitioner in advance of this date (on March 2, 2011), together with good faith overtures seeking an amicable resolution (see Exhibit B); and

(4)  Ethics Violations by Petitioner’s Attorney – Upon information and belief, Petitioner’s counsel has violated the Rules of Professional Conduct promulgated by the Kansas Judicial Branch by engaging in unethical behavior in this matter toward both Petitioner and Respondent.

Lack of Jurisdictional Authority

The Petitioner has long been a resident of the state of North Carolina, and evidenced by Petitioner’s: (1) valid North Carolina driver’s license; (2) voter’s registration and history of voting in the state of North Carolina; and (3) her employment by Air Wisconsin, whose duties are carried out on behalf of, and as agent for, U.S. Airways, where she has long been based out of U.S Air’s Raleigh-Durham (NC) airport hub.  In addition, Petitioner may still own a 1999 red Mercury Mystique, which was registered by the State of North Carolina.   Importantly, these irrefutable facts can be readily corroborated by the North Carolina Dept. of Motor Vehicles, the North Carolina State Board of Elections and Joel Kuplack, Vice President of Human Resources at Air Wisconsin.

Furthermore, an unqualified representation of North Carolina residency was attested to by the Petitioner, which was observed and confirmed first hand in a late night visit to the Petitioner’s North Carolina residence by the Durham (NC) Police.  Officers Tyler and Silla were dispatched pursuant to the directions of Durham Police Captain Ray Taylor to conduct a criminal investigation of alleged grand larceny theft by Petitioner, as well as an investigation into the welfare of the subject child in the Paternity Petition.  These findings of fact are contained in the Durham Police Criminal Incident Report # 11-007695.

According to Officer Tyler, Petitioner further represented to the Durham Police that she has engaged a family law attorney, duly licensed in the state of North Carolina, who on behalf of Petitioner, has obtained an “Ex Parte Order” from a Durham County court; however this has not been served on Respondent as of this writing. 

Timely Filing

As Respondent was unlawfully rendered homeless by what may be the worst instance of bank foreclosure fraud in U.S. history, and attempts have been made on his life, he necessarily maintains a nomadic existence until his claims are filed in Federal court and criminal investigations are commenced against those culpable.  Accordingly, the Respondent has long informed Petitioner to communicate by email.

Notwithstanding such requests, Respondent received only a four page Paternity Petition (incorporated herein as Exhibit C), which was taped to the front door of his mother’s residence.  Although the document was not noticed until sometime afterwards, it was marked posted on February 2, 2011, and requested an answer  30 days hence (i.e., March 4, 2011).

The Answer was timely filed on Mar. 4, 2011, which was confirmed received on that date by Judy Burnett of Barton County District Records Dept.  Moreover, Ms. Burnett volunteered, in her vast experience in her current role, that it was general practice to grant additional time to Respondent’s located out of state. 

Respondent’s Acts of Good Faith

In good faith, Respondent emailed Petitioner his Answer in advance of the deadline (on March 2, 2011, Exhibit B), and separately copied numerous other 3^rd parties as witnesses (this was conveyed in the body of the letter), including many members of Petitioner’s family.  Among other things, this “candid” and “from the heart” communiqué included:

Ø important historical context to the underlying matter;

Ø requested answers to long outstanding questions;

Ø his request for Petitioner to withdraw the “meritless” Paternity Petition;

Ø his proposal for a reconciliation; and what he planned to file as his . . .

Ø . . . Answer, in the event the Paternity Petition was not withdrawn.

Petitioner was further asked to forward this pending Answer to her attorney because her attorney did not have a website, published no fax or email address, and did not answer nor return phone calls made by the Respondent. Petitioner and her attorney did not respond.

Ethics Violations By Petitioner’s Attorney

On March 9, 2011, Respondent sent Petitioner’s attorney (Ms. Isern) a letter (Exhibit D), candidly articulating what he observed and concluded to be unethical behavior toward her client (who has only a high school diploma), citing: (1) failure to serve her client’s best interests; (2) failure to know her client; (3) antiquated operation of a law practice; (4) ignorance (or wanton dismissal) of material facts; (5) reckless disregard for the truth; and (6) behavior suggesting a possible link to criminal activities. 

Moreover, Ms. Isern has deviously attempted to deny the Respondent his right to legal due process by:

1.     Filing the meritless motion for default judgment;

2.     Scheduling an unjustifiably aggressive hearing date for the bogus motion, especially for an out of state Respondent (i.e., one week from the date of the motion);

3.     Orchestrating insufficient time to respond (note: as of this writing, Ms. Isern’s Motion for Summary Judgment has still NOT been received, and although Respondent called Ms. Isern a few times earlier in this week (to assess her integrity), and give her an opportunity to advise Mr. Young of her recent motion, she REFUSED under ANY circumstances to speak to Mr. Young.   

So how did Mr. Young learn of Ms. Isern’s deceitful plan?  Sensing something was amiss from her behavior patently fraudulent motion, Mr. Young called the Barton County District Court earlier this week and made inquiry – Judy Burnett informed him of Ms. Isern’s surreptitious motion and emailed him a copy. 

In the context of the operative facts, this is inexcusable behavior by an attorney, who well knew Respondent was not represented by counsel. Accordingly, Respondent is considering filing an ethics complaint against Petitioner’s attorney with the Disciplinary Administrator of the Kansas Judicial Branch.

Conclusion

Petitioner’s Motion for Default Judgment For Custody and Support should be dismissed.

Respectfully submitted,

Spencer C. Young

The Aftermath of Bank Foreclosure Fraud & MorganStanleyGate

Although the below correspondence is accessible via hyper-link from the March 3, 2011 blog entry, it is important enough make it a separate blog entry, as it illustrates how Morgan Stanley (with the assistance of Kirkland & Ellis) can orchestrate bringing the absolute worst out in people through dividing and conquering families by turning loved ones against each other.

Date:  March 2, 2011

To:       Leah R. Krier (via email:  BlueSkyGirl2u@aol.com)

Re:      The Aftermath of Bank Foreclosure Fraud & MorganStanleyGate

Dear Leah:

This is from the heart, and brutally honest.  It addresses how you, Jackson and I have been impacted by the worst bank foreclosure fraud in U.S. history, and yet another manifestation of the MorganStanleyGate scandal, a fraud of epic proportion.  Accordingly, this is being shared widely because silence is fraud's best friend – word-of-mouth is fraud's worst enemy – so I’m passing the word on.[1]

I’ve produced three short YouTube videos about our lives together since being blessed with Jackson, and ensuing victimization – click on each title to access.

Title	About
Broken Pieces	Jackson’s magical first year with us, providing a poignant backdrop to our little family later being “broken” into “pieces” by this foreclosure fraud
Hold Me Click here to call up lyrics to the soundtrack	The period since you estranged yourself and kidnapped our son, Jackson.  If Jackson could talk, I believe this is what he would say to me, with the last stanza representing my response to him.  Sadly YOU have separated a father and son.
Eyjesjuanchabacfagud	The 9 ½ months of Jackson’s second year, leading up to when our family was violently ripped apart, along with what is now an all but dissipated hope for the future.

These videos memorialize a relationship that once was, and OUR importance to Jackson as his loving parents, thereby providing important context to what has transpired since that fateful day in February last year.  And as I have been working toward correcting this injustice in a meaningful way, it would be helpful if you recognized you have been manipulated with bombastic lies by unsavory others, so you would turn against me in the most evil manner conceivable – and the sooner you realize this, the better it will be for EVERYONE.

This memorandum covers: our relationship; the assault; your response; my plans; questions that remain; a request; and concluding remarks.  And so that my points are clear and convincing, hyperlinks to additional information are incorporated throughout, and I encourage you to access them as you read this.

Our Relationship

You called me two months after we first met in February 2007 sitting next to each other at a Duke v. UNC game at Cameron Indoor.  Your then live-in boyfriend ("Mike") had booted you out on the street, after he had long abused you, and you were miserable living with another “Michael” at the time you called me.

I built you up, gave you encouragement and supported your self-improvement pursuits, for as you well know, I am a proponent of self-actualization.  When you became chronically ill, I was ALWAYS there to nurse you back to health. We fell in love, got engaged, and when you became pregnant (despite your assurances that doctors said you were unable to conceive), I treated you as a Princess.

After we were blessed with Jackson, I cared for him much of his first 21 months of his life, as you said you needed to keep your job as a flight attendant.  And I did so while addressing an overwhelming number of orchestrated tribulations entailing commercial sabotage at my investment properties, numerous instances of fraud, a libelous smear campaign, widespread corruption and astonishing instances of betrayal by those in whom I had vested my trust.

The Assault

Last year, on a cold sleeting winter day in February, we were victims of the worst bank foreclosure fraud and wrongful eviction[2] ever perpetrated in the United States, as it was on a mortgage that was:

Ø never late;

Ø not delinquent; and

Ø paid in full . . .

 . . . and executed in an unjustified over-the-top violent manner by a SWAT team of more than a dozen wayward officers of the Orange County (NC) Sheriff. This was an attempt to cover up revelations contained in a press release issued four days earlier, which exposed an explosive and heretofore UN-reported element of Foreclosure-gate now gripping the nation.

Your Response

Just hours before this traumatic event, you sent me a text message which ended with: “Jackson and I love you, need you”, which starkly contrasts with the vitriolic epistles that followed thereafter, the most recent ones being:  “I do not ever want to see you, I hate you” and “You are no longer Jackson’s Dad, you are nothing to him”.  And over the thirteen months in between, you have delivered apoplectic tirades far more vicious and typically fraught with expletives.  MorganStanleyGate has brought the absolute worst out in many people, and among my loved ones, you appear to be the representative “poster child”. 

For instance, the day after I barely averted assassination, but ended up being tortured and abused by corrupt Orange County cops, we agreed to rendezvous at the Washington-Duke Hotel when you arrived back in Durham that morning.  But you stood me up and remained unreachable throughout the day, while you secretly gathered your belongings (along with many of mine without my knowledge) and moved in with another man, whom you would only refer to as “Danny”.  And outside of a few brief, but very disturbing meetings punctuated by your uncontrollable screaming, I have not seen you since, and you have effectively kidnapped Jackson, while engaging in behavior I never imagined you could be associated with.

So in stark contrast to the tender loving care I had always provided to you in your frequent and often lengthy periods of need, the one time I needed my fiancée  to be there for me, you responded by:

1 -- Abandoning me;

2 -- Moving in with another man;

3 -- Kidnapping our son;

4 – Chronically lying to me;

5 -- Blocking my phone calls;

6 -- Blocking my text messages;

7 -- Blocking me on Facebook;

8 -- Blaming me for acts of criminals beyond my control;

9 -- Showering me with ad hominems; and

10 –Threatening me with bogus "restraining orders" and "lawsuits".

Your version of “standing by your man” has been devastating, and has severely hampered the timing and execution of my plans to regain what has impacted MANY . . . including Jackson’s older brothers (Michael, Kevin & Ryan), Maria, my mother, my sister, nieces, nephews, cousins, in-laws and even in-laws to be.  Your behavior has been so evil, it would suggest you wanted me to commit suicide.

My Plans

Notwithstanding your disturbing, disruptive and at times debilitating behavior throughout this painful aftermath, I have begun executing plans to correct his woeful injustice in contemplation of achieving very specific goals, which I have delineated below – I refer to them as “The Eight ‘R’s“:

I.          Restitution – The return of all assets stolen from this fraud, including:

A.        NY Residence – Manhasset, NY residence[3]

B.         NC Condominium – Meadowmont condominium

C.        Specialty Mall – The Pit Stop of Durham (“TPSoD”)

D.        Retail/Office Complex – The Courtyard of Chapel Hill (“TCoCH”)

E.         Land Parcels – For valet parking at TCoCH

F.         Cash – Monies stolen from bank accounts

G.        Receivables – cash amount of TPSoD & TCoCH rent receivables

II.         Recompense – Compensation for lost income

A.        Lost Wages

B.         Lost Investment Income

III.         Reinstatement – Personal & Corp. credit restored to pre-scandal status

IV.        Retraction – Retractions with apologies for the lies in 60 + “smear” articles

V.        Redemption – Repayment in full to creditors with valid claims

VI.        Retribution – Punitive damages to fund charitable foundation in support of victims of foreclosure fraud, Susan G. Komen For The Cure & the American Red Cross.

VII.       Resurrection – Regain reputation of accomplishment and  integrity

VIII.      Reunification - Reuniting with all of my loved ones, and eradicating the overwhelming dysfunction among family members

And as I move ahead in executing my plans, I would appreciate your cooperation, which begins with answering some pertinent questions.

Questions That Remain

There are many questions you've been oddly evading for quite some time, and I frankly don't understand why – for I certainly have a right to know the answers.  Moreover, skirting them as you have would indicate you’ve turned into a common thief, and you have no idea how sad that makes me – so please respond.  They are segregated into categories of: belongings; financial; behavioral; and legal.

Belongings:  Items taken without my knowledge are listed and pictured below:

Ø Automobile – You said it was your dream to drive a white Mercedes Benz. In response, I entrusted you with an S-320 sedan so you could safely drive Jackson with you. 

Where is this vehicle?  For at this point you have stolen it.

Ø Television & Sound System – You offered to take the Sony widescreen high definition TV and surround sound system out of the storage facility, indicating you had a place where it would be safe. 

It ended up accompanying you to “Danny’s”. He tells me he doesn't have it, but evades further questions.  This is also an instance of theft at this point.

Where is this very expensive equipment?

Ø Paintings – Several expensive paintings are missing, and you admitted to secretly taking the one above the T.V. Danny has been uncooperative.  This is also theft. 

Where are these paintings?

Other Items – Did you steal anything else?  Numerous satellite aerial photos confirm you moved the stolen belongings out of Danny Ozaki’s at 2702 Richwood Rd. in Durham, NC this past summer and into Paul Badaracco’s residence at 3107 Skybrook Lane in Durham, NC.  NOTE:  That is my White Mercedes Benz with the sun-roof sitting in the driveway on many different days.

Financial:

Ø Engagement Ring – Why didn’t you sell the engagement ring and use the proceeds for Jackson’s care, as I asked you to? (see Legal section below)

Ø Hiring of lawyer – Where did you get the money to hire an attorney?  What was the cost?

Ø Judgment – Wouldn't this have been better spent on Jackson's needs?

Behavioral:

Ø Jackson’s Well-Being – Since both your mother and father work full-time, who takes care of Jackson during your frequent multi-day trips?

Ø FaceBook Behavior – Why did you recently invite me to be your “friend”, block me, remove the block, and then reinstate it all in the span of 24 hours?

Ø Advanced knowledge – Did you speak with anyone with the Orange County Sheriff before the eviction? If so, when and with whom?  And afterwards?  Did you pre-arrange to have your belongings segregated from mine?  When?

Ø No Response – Why have you not responded to whether you know the people who sent us the vicious e-mails over Thanksgiving 2009 from a remote farmhouse in Potwin, Kansas?

Ø Capriciousness – Throughout this trying aftermath, you agreed to visit me with Jackson, only to reverse course next day.  Why?  Did someone talk you out of it each time?  If so, who?  What is the identity of those who have spoken about me to you in a disparaging manner in the past?  And know that I ask these questions in the context of resolving MorganStanleyGate.

Legal:

Ø Irrational Act – Why would you hire an attorney to file baseless monetary claims?  As you know, if you used the proceeds from the sale of the engagement ring, they would cover Jackson's needs (as you specified) over the next five years. (See “My Request” section below.)

Ø Foreclosure Fraud – Are you aware you have significant damages claims for pain and suffering against Paragon Commercial Bank, Poyner & Spruill and the Orange County (NC) Sheriff for the fraudulent foreclosure?

Ø Flawed Legal Advice – Who said you were the rightful owner of my engagement ring to you?  State law in North Carolina and Kansas are consistent and clear – I own the ring.  (See below.)

Kansas & North Carolina Law

On Ownership of Engagement Rings

Gift Law Concerning Engagement Rings

My Request

In addition to providing answers to the above questions, I have one final request:

Instruct your attorney to withdraw any and all legal filings against me in Barton County, KS

Important Note:  This page and those that follow, together with any and all hyperlinks constitutes My Response to your Paternity Petition, in the event it is not withdrawn.  I ask that you forward it to your attorney and those receiving copies of this transmittal shall serve as witnesses to this direction, thereby evidencing my timely response. 

This method of delivery is necessary because it is not practicable for me to print and mail them out given my current nomadic existence, and the volume of information contained in the embedded internet hyper-links – I again ask that all future communications to me be sent via e-mail. 

I will now summarize the key points of your 4-page Paternity Petition, and explain why it MUST be withdrawn. 

Summary: 

1.         Your Petition was filed on Oct. 6, 2010

2.         Papers were marked “posted” to my mother’s home on Feb. 2, 2011[4]

3.         Response is due 30 days of the date “posted” (i.e., Fri. Mar. 4, 2011)

4.         You seek joint custody of Jackson, as primary residential parent

5.         Filing “presumes” I am the natural father, based on the birth certificate

6.         You claim for reimbursement for Jackson’s expenses since birth

7.         You seek a judgment for ongoing support

Here’s Why You MUST Withdraw Your Petition:

I.          I May Not Be Jackson’s Biological Father – The fact that this could even be a possibility absolutely rips me apart; however your behavior in abandoning me to move in with another man when I needed you most (the day after I was assaulted) and ongoing revelations, together with your admitted promiscuous past and our times together suggests this could be a very real possibility.  Moreover, the presumption that I am the natural father based entirely on the birth certificate is woefully inadequate evidence, and in the event you choose to proceed with this patently bogus and ill-advised Paternity Petition (in the context of the facts contained herein), I hereby request an adjournment until paternity tests can be independently conducted by, and the results exchanged between, BOTH parties to ascertain whether I am in fact Jackson’s father.

More Specific Reasons: This is necessary because of: (1) your admitted, observed and well-documented promiscuous behavior, which is corroborated by the three examples that follow; (2) a birth certificate in no way proves the identity of a child's natural father; and (3) studies recently conducted have found that up to 35% all children born in the United States (and in other countries) are not sired by their presumed father, thereby contradicting what is on the birth certificate.

Examples of Promiscuous Behavior

Example #1:  Approximately six weeks after we were engaged to be married, you had sexual relations with three men at Hyco Lake, NC throughout the weekend of Aug. 3 – 5, 2007.  You denied this when I found the pictures on MY computer (see below), and although I forgave you, I did NOT believe you.  Importantly, this weekend is within conception period based on the typical human gestation period (37 – 42 weeks), and Jackson's birth date (April 14, 2008), especially when taking into account the gestation period with Jackson was shortened by your scheduled C-section.  See below analysis.

Important observation:  Up until this disturbing weekend at Hyco Lake, you were a loyal and loving partner, but your demeanor changed dramatically the week prior, which was when sabotage of The Courtyard of Chapel Hill began and the smear campaign articles started coming out.

Pictures of you with these three men are shown below, and are all time-stamped on the days of Aug. 3 – 5, 2007.  In the interest of discretion, I excluded those containing explicit nudity and compromising positions.  And it was on this weekend, you were adamant about my not accompanying you.

Hyco Lake – August 3-5, 2007

Top Row:   The men you allegedly had sex with that weekend included ex-boyfriend Russell Terrell. You said you couldn’t remember the names of the other two men, but you indicated one of them was married.

2nd Row:  Reflecting the drunken wild orgy-like nature of the weekend  

3rd Row:   More of this, but showing you wearing MY ENGAGEMENT RING in the pictures (unbelievable)

Bottom: Picture of you passed out drunk on the back of the boat aptly called “Temptation”
Example # 2:   You have admitted to having sex with pilots, first officers and other men on your numerous overnights throughout your career at Air Wisconsin, indicating this was commonplace in the airline Industry.  Reflected below is a montage of pictures of you with Air Wisconsin First Officer Paul “Big Boy” Badaracco, which he has represented to me were all taken on many, many “overnights” with you.  I personally found these exceptionally upsetting.

Frequent “Overnights”

Example # 3:  You've demonstrated an ability to quickly sever emotional ties and shack up with another man literally overnight and do so with a level of callousness that strikes many as selfish and malicious.  This was apparent when  you stood me up at the Washington Duke Hotel so that you could secretly gather your belongings and move in with another man.  In this case it was Danny Ozaki, who also served as your accomplice in absconding with the belongings earlier noted in the “Remaining Questions” section. 

And what struck me about the photos of you and Danny below are the dates in Jul-Sep 2009 (and in Durham, NC and Kansas), which is when you had been living with me in Chapel Hill, NC for over two years, and engaged to marry me.

Other Examples:  There is more I could bring up; however it is not my intent to embarrass you, but rather to present enough evidence to ensure paternity testing be MANDATORY before your Paternity Petition could ever be considered.

Notwithstanding, I reiterate my request to WITHDRAW your meritless Paternity Petition altogether, for the additional reasons that follow.

II.       Claims (If Valid) Have Been Prepaid – The wholesale value of MY engagement ring to YOU is $34,000, which I OWN (NOT YOU) pursuant to both North Carolina and Kansas law (Legal subsection of Questions That Remain) and I had authorized you to sell the ring, and use the proceeds for Jackson's needs. Based on your stated needs of $500 per month, the claims have thus been prepaid for the next five years +. 

III.       Your Counter-Productive Petition – You very well know I have always intended to provide for Jackson and the ONLY reason we face this situation is because I am unlawfully being denied a livelihood, as a result of the bank foreclosure fraud and its cover-up links to MorganStanleyGate, the effects of which were amplified by your abandonment when I needed you most.  And I would follow through with this commitment even if I were not his natural father, so long as you acknowledged your mistakes, ended your abandonment, and once again became the girl I fell in love with.  I want Jackson to experience a similarly enriching life as his older brothers (Michael, Kevin and Ryan) did, but I MUST resolve the MorganStanleyGate scandal to regain my livelihood and reputation in order to do so.  And having to refute your Paternity Petition in a Barton County, KS court is counter-productive and absolutely not possible for me at this point.

IV.      Your Misrepresentations of Claims – Your claim for reimbursement of Jackson's expenses since birth is patently absurd and you know it, for I had fully supported you and our son Jackson, while living in the lap of luxury by most standards, as you motored around town with Jackson in the white Mercedes-Benz you always wanted.  This lifestyle can be readily discerned in the linked videos at the outset of this communiqué , and anyone who wishes to become a Facebook friend of mine (by clicking here) will literally have access to a few thousand pictures of you and Jackson that further supports this. 

V.        My Contingent Counterclaim – In reality, you owe me $78,320.73, which I hereby submit as a counterclaim IF you choose to proceed with your Petition.  This includes paying your credit card debt whenever you got into trouble ($20,000 + interest), and the balance represents the value of the belongings you and Danny Ozaki absconded with (as per the Remaining Questions section).

VI.      Your Moral Support Would Be Mutually Beneficial – I’ve long said your moral support would be such a powerfully helpful factor in turning everything around quickly, because sometimes you just need someone to believe in you to accomplish things you never thought possible.  A modicum of moral support from you presented no downside, but offered enormous upside.  Yet you have not only rebuffed all such requests for as long as this has gone on, but you've been vicious in your responses which were ALWAYS punctuated with pejoratives.

VII.     You Will Otherwise Be Supporting Our Adversaries – A factor that has made, and will continue to make, my quest for justice more challenging is loved ones turning against me, even though the evidence is clear that they were duped into doing so.  My adversaries will say: “You see, even his own family will not support him.”  It's all been staged.  Some family members have come around, and I will keep chipping away until I've got everyone on board.

Concluding Remarks

In closing, you should know I am NOT your enemy . . .  so please stop behaving like mine.  I am merely someone who has offered unconditional love for you (and Jackson) . . . which is an emotion I’m astonished still exists in retrospect to how dreadfully you have treated me throughout this ordeal.  And by filing your misguided Paternity Petition against me, you gave me no choice but to be blunt and explicit in this response, and while it may be embarrassing to you to have THIS ELEMENT of MorganStanleyGate widely shared, no malice is intended.  I did so because of the absolute necessity for:

Transparency – I must make anything and everything associated with MorganStanleyGate a matter of public record now, as this scandal is predicated on criminal fraud and cover-up in the form of BOLD-FACED LIES, and the more facts I get out in the open, the sooner the right people will become engaged . . . and it is only then that this gets resolved.  And revealing the devastating impact the scandal has had on my loved ones (in this case, you and Jackson) is an important part of this; and

Rationality – I’m hoping people who care about you (and Jackson) will convince you to stop behaving in such a reckless, unprincipled and criminal manner, and have the sense to recognize I am on your side and “one of the good guys”.  So with this in mind, I am asking you to:

1.               Answer the Questions;

2.               Withdraw the Petition;

3.               Sell the engagement ring and use the proceeds for Jackson;

4.               Do away with your estrangement;

5.               Stop your kidnapping of Jackson;

6.               Remove ALL communication blocks;

7.               Return or otherwise account for the stolen belongings;

8.               Terminate your illicit affair and cohabitation with Paul Badaracco;

9.               Become informed by visiting my websites; and

10.            Leave the “dark side” for God’s sake

At this point, I don’t know who you are, or if you possess any moral values.  I have often said this bank foreclosure fraud (and the events leading up to it) has transmogrified you into a monster I never knew existed. 

Hopping from the bed of one man to the other in a makeshift cohabitation arrangement, and engaging in grand larceny, while our son is cared for via hand-off between a rag-tag team of family members hundreds of miles away for a week or more at a time, is no way to raise a child.  And to do so to the exclusion of his father, who had dutifully cared for him throughout his first 21 months of his life, reflects exceptionally poor judgment.

Sincerely,

Spencer C. Young

---

[1] Derived from the motto of Fraud Aid, a fraud victim advocacy group

[2] Fortunately, you and Jackson were hundreds of miles away at the time, but this was NOT a coincidence

[3] Although Morgan Stanley and Wachovia had aggressively sought to foreclose, this was sold prior thereto

[4] Although  marked “posted” on Feb. 2, 2011, the 4-page document was not received until Feb. 8